Move Fast or Wait?
In the case of PulsePoint Solutions, Jeannie, who has just stepped in a new leadership role, should listen to the consistent apprehension from her team and wait to implement the Gen AI technology. While this innovation aligns well with the PulsePoint’s product, a rushed deployment aimed at cutting costs and head count risk can exacerbate the company’s profitability challenges and may contribute to unforeseen consequences.
While Jeannie envisions replacing a large portion of the sales team with Gen AI, she fails to test any of her assumptions such as
- Client Respectiveness to AI-driven Interactions
- Accuracy and Efficacy of Gen AI in replicating Sales Calls
- Negative Effect on Human-Centered Brand Reputation
Given PulsePoint’s existing struggles with profitability, they should use the fast-follower approach. By closely tracking their competitors’ implementation of Gen AI, PulsePoint can ensure it remains competitive while learning from others’ successes and failures. Additionally, before making sweeping changes to head count or employee responsibility scope, they should pilot Gen AI as a way to complement the existing sales force. Feedback from the sales team and data generated from trials can provide helpful insights on whether they should move forward with Gen AI.
Factors in Decision Making
1. Customers Feedback
Since PulsePoint’s B2B business model heavily relies on its sales team, it is essential to gauge client resistance before implementing new technologies. A long-standing, loyal client already asked to be exempt from the implementation, and rumors of Gen AI’s quick implementation seem to already have a negative effect on PulsePoint’s brand reputation. To mitigate this, company leadership should
- Take a firm and clear stance about the trial period of the technology
- Reiterate their commitment to quality service and how this technology will only grow more advance over time
- Urge less traditionalist clients to be apart of their trial implementation while explaining hesitant clients may opt-out.
If Jeannie is correct about the accuracy and efficacy, then widespread adoption should occur similar to cloud computing.
2. Core Challenges over Technology
PulsePoint’s primary challenge is profitability, not necessarily technological stagnation. Implementing Gen AI without addressing the underlying profitability issues risks becoming a distraction rather than a solution. To ensure alignment with business goals, Jeannie and the leadership team should:
- Prioritize discussions about outcomes rather than jumping to solutions
- Collaborate with the CTO and other leaders to evaluate whether Gen AI aligns with the company’s core strategy
- Position Gen AI as a tool to enhance, not replace, the capabilities of the sales team
A deliberate focus on profitability will prevent technology from becoming a costly misstep. Jeannie must emphasize how Gen AI can complement existing processes, improve efficiency, and deliver measurable business value.
3. Monitoring Competitors’ Moves
To stay competitive without unnecessary risk, PulsePoint should observe how competitors are adopting Gen AI. By waiting to see how early adopters perform, PulsePoint can avoid costly pitfalls while ensuring it doesn’t fall behind. For instance, Facebook was able to overtake MySpace by learning from MySpace’s mistakes such as their outdated design and ad clutter, directly addressing the issues while minimizing costs.
—
Mina Ky
