Individual user interviews:
I performed two in-person interviews with Stanford students about their relationships with their clothes and lending/borrowing clothes on campus. The two students I interviewed had quite different perspectives on their clothes. Even though both valued clothing, they had two different mindsets on how they acquired clothes and maintained their wardrobe. I would have to do more interviews and research to see if we could potentially segment the market into two different groups: borrowers and buyers.
Quotes:
“I’d say I really like the clothes i own – I care a lot about my style. I tend to get bored of the clothes I own so I have to buy new clothing items on a monthly basis.”
“I’m a little less excited about my ‘going out’ clothes – because I don’t wear them as much, I put a little less thought into them. I don’t have too many bc I don’t want to pay too much for clothes I don’t wear . . . my going out clothes are usually my friends'”
Shared market size research:
TAM – Total Addressable Market
-
- How many people would want or need the product?
- 330 million people in the United States
- Sports fans
- 26% of the United States avid sports fans
- How many people would want or need the product?
- 44% casual sports fans – casual sports fans would be a big target for sports fans (~145 million)
-
-
-
- Assumption that most would be a one sport season fan ~4 months
-
- Costume/holiday
- Would only apply for large holidays – Halloween, Christmas, Easter, etc
- These people are likely encapsulated in the sports market
- **I don’t think this generalizes as well to the TAM. I think it would be better to change the revenue structure when generalized to all adults because a year-around subscription model would not serve as well for these one off holiday and sporting event situations.
-
- How large would the market be in $$ if they all bought in?
- 145 million * 10 * 4 = $5.8 billion net revenue
SAM – Served Available Market
- How many people need or can use the product?
- Probably a matter of want more than a matter of need – would be useful for four year college students, specifically those students that do not live at home
- 14 million college students in the US that attend a 4-year university
- ¼ of these students live with their parents, but the service could still extend to these students
- ~30% of college students participate in parties, 4.2 million students
- How large would the market be in $$ if they all bought in?
- Clothing donations **
- 4.2 million projected customers
- $10/month subscription + possibly option to buy used clothes ($5 every other person per year)
- $10/month I got by talking to students to see what they would be willing to pay for a monthly subscription service for rally
- 8 months of school year (excluding december, june, july, august)
- 8*10*4.2 million + 5*2.1 million = $346.2 million
SOM – Serviceable Obtainable Market
-
- Stanford students
- Clothing donations**
- 25% of Stanford students participate in Greek life, but you don’t join Greek life until Spring freshman year (2000 students for 3 months, 1500 students for 5 months) = 6000+7500 = 13,500 subscriptions if everyone subscribed
- Based on campus culture from talking to students, seems like somewhere from 25-50% would be subscribe (3375-6750 subscriptions per school year)
- 97% of students live on campus (~7500 students)
- 10% of on campus students not in Greek life would be interested in participating in social activities creating a need for costume wear and ¼ to ½ would subscribe (750 additional students, 1500-3000 subscriptions per school year)
- Assuming for every other person participating, we would profit $5 from purchase of costume wear = 612.5-1225 students
- Average of ~920 students
- Total $$
- 4875-9750 subscriptions per year
- Average of 7300 subscriptions per year
- 4875-9750 subscriptions per year
- Stanford students
-
-
- $73,000 from subscriptions
-
-
-
-
-
- 920 student purchases of clothing
-
-
-
-
-
- $1,840 from purchases
-
-
-
- ~$75k/year
-
