BOBO Comparative Research and Participatory Roadmaps

Comparative Research

2×2 learnings:

  • Uber, Lyft:
    • Very convenient → just call right when you need it, very expensive, very large user base, lots of safety measures taken, various riding options and pricing based on size/luxury of a car, subscription model tied with other apps for Uber (ex. UberEats), split the fare options amongst riders
  • Public transportation:
    • Quality and convenience definitely vary across regions, 
  • Zipcar:
    • on-demand service and automobile reservations to its members who want a car-free lifestyle
    • Covers gas, insurance options,* parking and maintenance
    • available in over 1,500 cities and towns
    • charged extra for returning late – higher fee (ex. $50)
  • BlaBlaCar:
    • A long-distance carpooling app that connects traveling car owners and people looking for rides in the same direction
    • Currently available in 22 European and Latin American countries
    • Rider: find your desired ride, and pay your driver in cash at the end of the ride
    • Driver: post your trip, vehicle information, and price per rider.
    • chat features view each other’s profiles, which display ratings, preferences, a mini bio
    • Users can even select their preferred level of conversation, between “Bla” (fairly quiet) and “BlaBlaBla” (talkative).
    • Safety:
      • government-issued IDs, mutual Facebook and LinkedIn connections, user’s experience level, % of positive ratings, and how long they’ve been on the platform.
      • woman travelers → can use the “Ladies Only” feature to ensure you match with other women for your trips.
    • Drivers do not earn a profit by using the BlaBlaCar app →riders only contribute gas
    • Riders are charged a 10-12% transaction fee with every ride
  • Ridepool:
    • Share uber rides among Stanford students
    • Users get to schedule rides the want to go on and the website matches the with other students who want to go on the same trip

 

Participatory Roadmapping

Priority Stack

Notes:

  • Safety onboarding is a more prioritized feature for riders than drivers → might be due to effort, feeling like they are safe, good people (ie don’t need this from their pov)
  • Payment system and pricing are important features
    • More specific questions about pricing – how would a “zone” based system work? Would it be traveling within a county (ex. $5 for any trip in Santa Clara county?) or based on distance (ex. Buckets of 1-3miles: $3, 3-6 miles: $5, etc)
  • Drivers and riders both want to be able to specify trip details and see trip details to know expectations (ex. Time, location) for clarity of communication
Avatar

About the author