CASE STUDY: We Know What You Did

The advertising revenue model, as explored in the “We Know What You Did” podcast, has its pros and cons. On the positive side, it offers free access to content and services for a wide audience, provides revenue for creators, allows targeted advertising, and enables data-driven improvements. However, it also raises concerns regarding privacy, intrusive ad formats, clickbait content, and the rise of ad-blockers.

This model can affect individual well-being in contradictory ways. It enhances accessibility and convenience by offering free access to a wide array of content, but it also normalizes surveillance, making users more accepting of online tracking, thereby impacting privacy and increasing stress.

To mitigate the negative impacts, several strategies can be employed. Advertisers should focus on creating more relevant and personalized ads, use non-intrusive formats, and limit ad frequency. Transparency in data collection and ethical advertising practices can improve user trust, as well. Additionally, providing ad personalization controls and educating users about online advertising practices can empower them to make informed decisions. 

In conclusion, the advertising revenue model presents a dual impact on well-being, offering accessibility but raising concerns over privacy and intrusiveness. Employing the mentioned strategies can help strike a balance between monetization and user well-being, promoting a user-friendly advertising environment.

Laura Castro Venegas

About the author